Board logo

标题: Heresies in Early Christianity Developments [打印本页]

作者: Susan     时间: 2006-8-29 22:52     标题: Heresies in Early Christianity Developments

Heresies in Early Christianity Developments

Donatism:
Donatism was taught by Donatus, bishop of Casae Nigrae (in North Africa) that the effectiveness of the sacraments depends on the moral character of the minister. Their primary disagreement with the rest of the Church was over the treatment of those who forsook their faith during the Persecution (303–305 AD) of Diocletian. Donatists proclaimed that any sacraments celebrated by the priests and bishops who had betrayed their belief were invalid.

The birth of the Donatist movement came out of opposition to the appointment of Caecilian as bishop of Carthage. One of the three bishops, Felix, bishop of Aptunga, who consecrated Caecilian, had given copies of the Bible to the Roman persecutors. A group of about 70 bishops formed a synod and declared the consecration of the bishop to be invalid.

Donatism’s unforgiving nature and its hostility to Roman authorities even after Christianity was legalized made them an enemy to the Roman churches. In 317 its believers were persecuted by Constantine. In 409, Marcellinus of Carthage, Emperor Honorius's secretary of state, decreed the group heretical and demanded that they give up their churches. They were harshly persecuted by the Roman authorities. However it survived long time in North Africa into the Muslim period.

Arianism:
Arianism was a Christological view held by followers of Arius, a Christian priest who lived and taught in Alexandria, Egypt, around 320AD. It is said to "almost took over the church". When the Germanic peoples entered the Roman Empire and founded successor-kingdoms, most had been Arian Christians for more than a century

Arianism held the belief that Jesus not divine but a human adopted by the God as son. Jesus is not the one God, but a separate being subordinate to the Father, and that Jesus at one time did not exist. I personally think this concept is much easier to follow than the concept of Trinity.

Arianism was condemned in the first ecumenical council of the church : the council of Nicaea in 325.

Marcionism:
Marcionism was an religious organization found by Marcion, a wealthy son of bishop from Sinope (in Modern Northern Turkey). It is considered by the Roman Catholic Church to have been "the most dangerous foe Christianity has ever known".

Marcionism contradicted Orthodox Christianity in two major aspects:

First, it believes that there are two Gods. The world (and much of the sufferings in the world) is created by the bad God who is jealous, inconstant, wrathful, and legalistic --- the harsh Jewish God in the Old Testament ; and Jesus was sent by the good God to free humanity from his vengeful predecessor.

Consequently, Marcionism denied the human nature of the Christ, believing that Jesus was divine all the time and was never human. His human body was just an illusion. (This belief is also called Docetism, which was condemned at the Council of Chalcedon in 451.)

Marcionism therefore posed two problems to the Orthodox Christianity : first, by claiming that it is the bad God that created all the sufferings, it undermined the original sin of the humanity inherited from Adam; secondly, it undermined the Jesus’ sacrifice in his crucifixion, since he was believed never to be a human.

Gnosticism:
Gnosticism may have been an adaptation of Greek philosophy. Gnosis in Greek means knowledge. It believes that our world is illusional and the only salvation is to obtain a special knowledge that will free ourselves from the delusional attachment to material reality and deliver ourselves to a better place with the Father. The movie Matrix borrowed a lot of ideas from Gnosticism! The Gospel of Thomas is considered to be Gnostic. Gnosticism also sounds very close to Buddhism to me.

Gnosticism was troublesome to Orthodox Christianity in several ways : Since the salvation depends on the personal quest of knowledge, the hierachy system of the church is therefore not respected as the church wanted people to. Women were equal to men in Gnosticism (as described by the Da Vinci Code). Also, the belief that Jesus is the only path to salvation --- crucial in Orthodox Christianity --- was not considered as important in Gnosticism.

Sources :
The Christian Apoloetics and Research Ministry: http://www.carm.org/heresy.htm
The Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org
Time magazine: The Lost Gospels. Dec. 22, 2003
Lost Christianities by Bart Ehrman
Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown
作者: adagio     时间: 2006-8-30 10:12
Is this the clear-minded Susan from Mayacafe? Greetings!
作者: thesunlover     时间: 2006-8-30 10:17
Welcome Susan.
作者: 八十一子     时间: 2006-8-30 12:43
Very good.

I think Gnosticism is still quite popular among today's Christians, even though they would not admit it openly.

How about some notes on the current denominations of Christianity?
作者: Susan     时间: 2006-8-30 19:30
谢adagio, 谢thesunlover, 又见到你们真高兴啊!

回八十一子,current denominations of Christianity 我也很感兴趣,谁给总结
一下就好了。

我以前一直奇怪佛教和基督教的修行方式的巨大差异:佛教讲究开悟,似乎不大强
调信望爱。后来看了Gnosticism,觉得它是两个宗教间的missing link,只不过在西
方被镇压掉了(cult里还是层出不穷)。
作者: 令胡冲     时间: 2006-8-30 19:35
苏三会说中文。  

>>觉得它是两个宗教间的missing link

为什么两个宗教间非得要一种link呢?
作者: Susan     时间: 2006-8-30 19:54
回令胡,因为当时东西方还是有交流的,宗教这种东西是抄来抄去的,完全不相同反
到有点奇怪。

中文是会说地,只是只能在上班和回家的间隙中说。这样也好,说得少点。
作者: 令胡冲     时间: 2006-8-30 20:00
>>宗教这种东西是抄来抄去的,完全不相同反到有点奇怪。

文化有交流。宗教抄来抄去,有什么证据嘛?

>>中文是会说地,只是只能在上班和回家的间隙中说。这样也好,说得少点。

嫁老外的好处。
作者: xw     时间: 2006-8-31 14:15
苏姗讲早期基督教,我昨晚读许达然的《罗马帝国的衰亡》中把早期
基督教叫“乞丐的宗教”,怕是罗马贵族的惯例。

讲到早期基督教与佛教的联系,我也有不少朋友提的,甚至不少犹太
人科学家都这样,更不用说人类学家了。至于说到修炼,早期基督教
都修炼的,记得有一部小说,或马思涅改编的歌剧《苔绮丝》就讲到
修炼证悟的。

那也许是Coptic。

而以弗所会议中的事,罗素以为是罗马教区舞弊所为。那里一性教所
谓Monothelites还有Nestorius,我在以弗所记中写过一首诗记,引
于文末。按史宾格勒的意思,这些被迫害的异教所来都融入伊斯兰教
的怀抱,亦即是真正解脱其文化上的“伪形”。

伊斯兰教有苏菲,也是讲修炼证悟的。

天主教的修士们,也脱不开修行积德的。

佛教也讲究信望爱的,那里信叫“发愿”,爱叫“慈悲”。

&&&

至于马丁*路得后来产生出来的观念,欧洲三十年的战火废墟中,他
也曾后悔当初。。。这个可以贴给Adagio的新教资本主义。

我论这些也不在行,见伊甸没人讨论,投一小石。至于具体的大论又
不是在下的专业,罗素与史宾格勒的意见在这里:

http://www.chineseliterature.com.cn/zongjiao/luosu-xfzxs/039.htm

http://www.mayacafe.com/forum/topic1.php3?tkey=1103154188

====

小诗一首附于贴末:

宗教全會

基督﹐還是三位一體
帝國各教區眾說紛紜

人母﹐抑或上帝之母
以弗所會議糾合名目

羅馬主教區搶先入會
關閉大門﹐裁判端異
作者: wxll     时间: 2006-8-31 17:30
热烈欢迎Susan.
作者: Susan     时间: 2006-8-31 19:31
谢WXLL!

回令胡,没有“嫁老外”啦!你这人怎么净造谣啊?上回骗我什么adagio和gadfly打
赌的事还没找你算账呢。

东西交流和宗教抄来抄去的例子可多啦,容我以后慢慢讲。

回XW,就是嘛,我就觉得早期基督教和佛教有类似之处,只是后来各自走远。Nestorius
第一次听说,很有意思。基督教就是这点麻烦:说基督只是人的算异端,说只是神
的也算异端;先人后神,先神后人,统统异端地干活;说有人神两性吧,还是异端,
太不user friendly了。据说伊斯兰教就是因为没有那么多脑筋急转弯,才得以迅速
发展壮大。




欢迎光临 伊甸文苑 (http://yidian.org/) Powered by Discuz! 2.5