Originally posted by 海外逸士 at 2016-1-7 17:44:
根據閣下對道的解釋，道表達一種概念。所以是抽象名詞。
專有名詞只包括人名，地名，山川河流名，船舶名之類。表達概念名詞，即使是專有概念，也不屬專有名詞範圍。請參考語法書。
本人在國內大學兼教語法。..
Still reading Chinese grammar books? I highly recommend that you read English ones so that you can learn Authentic English and true English skills.
I am making my effort here to help you understand what a proper noun is, this basic English grammar skill. Here is the quote from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_noun that gives a detailed explanation to what a proper noun is.
A proper noun is a noun that in its primary application refers to a unique entity, such as London, Jupiter, Sarah, or Microsoft, as distinguished from a common noun, which usually refers to a class of entities (city, planet, person, corporation), or non-unique instances of a specific class (a city, another planet, these persons, our corporation).[1] Some proper nouns occur in plural form (optionally or exclusively), and then they refer to groups of entities considered as unique (the Hendersons, the Everglades, the Azores, the Pleiades). Proper nouns can also occur in secondary applications, for example modifying nouns (the Mozart experience; his Azores adventure), or in the role of common nouns (he's no Pavarotti; a few would-be Napoleons). The detailed definition of the term is problematic and to an extent governed by convention.[2]
A distinction is normally made in current linguistics between proper nouns and proper names. By this strict distinction, because the term noun is used for a class of single words (tree, beauty), only single-word proper names are proper nouns: Peter and Africa are both proper names and proper nouns; but Peter the Great and South Africa, while they are proper names, are not proper nouns. The term common name is not much used to contrast with proper name, but some linguists have used the term for that purpose. Sometimes proper names are called simply names; but that term is often used more broadly. Words derived from proper names are sometimes called proper adjectives (or proper adverbs, and so on), but not in mainstream linguistic theory. Not every noun or noun phrase that refers to a unique entity is a proper name. Blackness and chastity are common nouns, even if blackness and chastity are considered unique abstract entities.
Few proper names have only one possible referent: there are many places named New Haven; Jupiter may refer to a planet, a god, a ship, or a symphony; at least one person has been named Mata Hari, but so have a horse, a song, and three films; there are towns and people named Toyota, as well as the company.
In English, proper names in their primary application cannot normally be modified by an article or other determiner (such as any or another), although some may be taken to include the article the, as in the Netherlands, the Roaring Forties, or the Rolling Stones. A proper name may appear to refer by having a descriptive meaning, even though it does not (the Rolling Stones are not stones and do not roll; a woman named Rose is not a flower). Or if it had once been descriptive (and then perhaps not even a proper name at all), it may no longer be so (a location previously referred to as "the new town" may now have the proper name Newtown, though it is no longer new, and is now a city rather than a town).
Hope this is helpful. I have a request for you and hope you will fulfill it. You see, on Venus, there is such a phenomenon that every morning there is a great gust of wind that ripples the land. American scientists want to name this phenomenon so that they can properly refer to it in their discussion. Someone suggests that they use the name the Chinese philosopher Lao Zi gave in his book “Dao De Jing”that describes how the world came into being. Can you help me come up with the English proper noun for it?
Thank you.
